Fuel Alone Cannot Define Economic Speed: A Parametric Model of Hull Fouling and Engine Ageing in Indonesian Coastal Cargo Operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/esa.v5i5.33Keywords:
Economic Speed, Fuel consumption modelling, Hull Fouling, Slow Steaming, Carbon Intensity IndicatorAbstract
Fuel represents the dominant variable cost in ship operation, and the selection of sailing speed is the principal lever available to an operator seeking to control it. This study develops a transparent parametric model of fuel consumption and economic speed for a representative Indonesian coastal general cargo vessel, and uses it to quantify how hull fouling and engine ageing alter both. The model combines a cubic speed-power relationship with a constant auxiliary load, and derives the cost-optimal speed by minimising total cost per nautical mile. Parameters are taken from published literature rather than from measurement, and the study is therefore explicitly a simulation rather than an empirical trial. Two configurations were compared: a new vessel with a specific fuel oil consumption of 185 g/kWh and a clean hull, and an aged vessel with 205 g/kWh and 25% added resistance. The model predicts a fuel penalty attributable to ageing of between 27.9% and 36.4% across the range 8 to 15 knots, averaging 33.3%, and a reduction in cost-optimal speed from 10.22 to 9.17 knots. A methodological finding of wider consequence also emerges: minimising fuel per nautical mile alone yields an optimum of 4.61 knots, which is operationally meaningless, demonstrating that economic speed cannot be defined on fuel consumption alone but requires the vessel time cost to be represented explicitly. Sensitivity analysis shows the optimum is more responsive to time cost than to fouling severity.
References
Adland, R., & Jia, H. (2018). Dynamic speed choice in bulk shipping. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(2), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-016-0002-3
Adland, R., Cariou, P., & Wolff, F.-C. (2020). Optimal ship speed and the cubic law revisited: Empirical evidence from an oil tanker fleet. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 140, Article 101972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101972
Bayraktar, M., & Sokukcu, M. (2024). Marine vessel energy efficiency performance prediction based on daily reported noon reports. Ships and Offshore Structures, 19(6), 831-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2023.2214490
Bayraktar, M., & Yuksel, O. (2023). A scenario-based assessment of the energy efficiency existing ship index (EEXI) and carbon intensity indicator (CII) regulations. Ocean Engineering, 278, Article 114295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114295
Bialystocki, N., & Konovessis, D. (2016). On the estimation of ship's fuel consumption and speed curve: A statistical approach. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 1(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2016.02.001
Ceylan, B. O. (2024). Marine diesel engine turbocharger fouling phenomenon risk assessment application by using fuzzy FMEA method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 238(3), 514-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/14750902231208848
Chen, Z. S., Lam, J. S. L., & Xiao, Z. (2023). Prediction of harbour vessel fuel consumption based on machine learning approach. Ocean Engineering, 278, Article 114483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114483
Chuah, L. F., Mokhtar, K., Mhd Ruslan, S. M., Bakar, A. A., Abdullah, M. A., Osman, N. H., Bokhari, A., Mubashir, M., & Show, P. L. (2023). Implementation of the energy efficiency existing ship index and carbon intensity indicator on domestic ship for marine environmental protection. Environmental Research, 222, Article 115348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115348
CNBC Indonesia. (2025, February 25). 50% kapal laut di RI sudah mendekati masa uzur, bahaya? CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20250225101614-4-613388/50-kapal-laut-di-ri-sudah-mendekati-masa-uzur-bahaya
Coraddu, A., Oneto, L., Baldi, F., Cipollini, F., Atlar, M., & Savio, S. (2019). Data-driven ship digital twin for estimating the speed loss caused by the marine fouling. Ocean Engineering, 186, Article 106063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.045
Corbett, J. J., Wang, H., & Winebrake, J. J. (2009). The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 593-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.08.005
Czermanski, E., Oniszczuk-Jastrzabek, A., Spangenberg, E. F., Kozlowski, L., Adamowicz, M., Jankiewicz, J., & Cirella, G. T. (2022). Implementation of the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index: An important but costly step towards ocean protection. Marine Policy, 145, Article 105259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105259
Demirel, Y. K., Turan, O., & Incecik, A. (2017). Predicting the effect of biofouling on ship resistance using CFD. Applied Ocean Research, 62, 100-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.12.003
Fagerholt, K., Laporte, G., & Norstad, I. (2010). Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(3), 523-529. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.77
Farkas, A., Degiuli, N., Martic, I., & Ancic, I. (2022). Energy savings potential of hull cleaning in a shipping industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374, Article 134000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134000
Farkas, A., Song, S., Degiuli, N., Martic, I., & Demirel, Y. K. (2020). Impact of biofilm on the ship propulsion characteristics and the speed reduction. Ocean Engineering, 199, Article 107033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107033
Gkerekos, C., Lazakis, I., & Theotokatos, G. (2019). Machine learning models for predicting ship main engine fuel oil consumption: A comparative study. Ocean Engineering, 188, Article 106282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106282
Goicoechea, N., & Abadie, L. M. (2021). Optimal slow steaming speed for container ships under the EU emission trading system. Energies, 14(22), Article 7487. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227487
Jimenez, V. J., Kim, H., & Munim, Z. H. (2022). A review of ship energy efficiency research and directions towards emission reduction in the maritime industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, Article 132888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132888
Kokkulunk, G., Parlak, A., & Erdem, H. H. (2016). Determination of performance degradation of a marine diesel engine by using curve based approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 108, 1136-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.019
Mimica, D., Ljubenkov, B., Blagojevic, B., Bezic, I., Basic, J., & Degiuli, N. (2025). Retrofitting a pre-propeller duct on a motor yacht: A full-scale CFD validation study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(11), Article 2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13112125
Park, M.-H., Hur, J.-J., Yun, G.-H., & Lee, W.-J. (2025). Scenario-based economic analysis of underwater biofouling using artificial intelligence. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(5), Article 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13050952
Pruyn, J. (2017). Are the new fuel-efficient bulkers a threat to the old fleet? Maritime Business Review, 2(3), 224-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-01-2017-0002
Psaraftis, H. N., & Kontovas, C. A. (2013). Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: A taxonomy and survey. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 26, 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.012
Psaraftis, H. N., & Kontovas, C. A. (2014). Ship speed optimization: Concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 44, 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.001
Ronen, D. (1982). The effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33(11), 1035-1040. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1982.215
Ronen, D. (2011). The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(1), 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.169
Ross, H. H., & Schinas, O. (2019). Empirical evidence of the interplay of energy performance and the value of ships. Ocean Engineering, 190, Article 106403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106403
Schultz, M. P. (2007). Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling, 23(5), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010701461974
Schultz, M. P., Bendick, J. A., Holm, E. R., & Hertel, W. M. (2011). Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling, 27(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
Uyan, E., Atlar, M., & Gursoy, O. (2024). Energy use and carbon footprint assessment in retrofitting a novel energy saving device to a ship. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(10), Article 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101879
Uyanik, T., Karatug, C., & Arslanoglu, Y. (2020). Machine learning approach to ship fuel consumption: A case of container vessel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84, Article 102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102389
Uzun, D., Demirel, Y. K., Coraddu, A., & Turan, O. (2019). Time-dependent biofouling growth model for predicting the effects of biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Ocean Engineering, 191, Article 106432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106432
Vasilev, M., Kalajdzic, M., & Momcilovic, N. (2025). On energy efficiency of tankers: EEDI, EEXI and CII. Ocean Engineering, 317, Article 120028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120028
Wang, S., & Meng, Q. (2012). Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(3), 701-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.12.003
Wu, W.-M. (2020). The optimal speed in container shipping: Theory and empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136, Article 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101903
Xing, H., Spence, S., & Chen, H. (2020). A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134, Article 110222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110222
Yan, D., Chen, C., Gan, W., Sasa, K., He, G., & Yu, H. (2025). Carbon intensity indicator (CII) compliance: Applications of ship speed optimization on each level using measurement data. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 212, Article 117593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117593
Yan, R., Wang, S., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2021). Data analytics for fuel consumption management in maritime transportation: Status and perspectives. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 155, Article 102489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102489
Yang, H., Sun, Z., Han, P., & Ma, M. (2024). Data-driven prediction of ship fuel oil consumption based on machine learning models considering meteorological factors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 238(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/14750902231210047
Zhang, D., Song, Y., Gao, J., Shen, Z., Li, L., & Yao, A. (2025). Research on ship engine fuel consumption prediction algorithm based on adaptive optimization generative network. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(6), Article 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13061140
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences (ESA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
